Monday, 17 July 2017 11:52

Lynching Or Self-Defense? Hear It From Main Person Involved

Written by

How often do you blame someone based on media reports?

Recently, Naresh, the main accused in Train Lynching case was arrested from Dhule (Maharashtra) for murdering Junaid. His revelations compel us to dawn upon an unfortunate reality - The mainstream media manages to force down distorted narratives down our unassuming intellectual throats. While Ultra-Seculars were busy blaming Gau-Rakshaks and advocating Beef-Eating Constitutional Rights in Junaid’s Murder Case, the original admission of Naresh fell on the media's deaf ears. That’s because Media Hit-men stoop to abysmal depths to safeguard and further their unpardonable crimes.

Recently, Naresh, the main accused in Train Lynching case was arrested from Dhule (Maharashtra) for murdering Junaid. His revelations compel us to dawn upon an unfortunate reality - The mainstream media manages to force down distorted narratives down our unassuming intellectual throats. While Ultra-Seculars were busy blaming Gau-Rakshaks and advocating Beef-Eating Constitutional Rights in Junaid’s Murder Case, the original admission of Naresh fell on the media's deaf ears. That’s because Media Hit-men stoop to abysmal depths to safeguard and further their unpardonable crimes.

B for "Beef" or B for "Brinda Karat"?

While owning up to his crime, he complained that Junaid's brothers and family members had been misleading police officers at the behest of CPM leader Brinda Karat. He repeatedly stated that the entire argument was purely over seat sharing and misbehavior with a senior citizen. The Beef angle erupted only after a meeting took place between Brinda Karat and Junaid's brothers.

As per Police Records, eye-witnesses confirm the following:

1) Junaid initiated the assault first.
2) Naresh used the knife to save himself from being killed.
3) Junaid's brothers have been changing their testimonies from time to time.
4) Junaid's friends were trying to mislead the police officials.

It has also been proven that the fight was nowhere connected to beef.

Some Theories Harbored By The Main Stream Media:

Distortion No 1: Naresh boarded the train with his friends.
Reality: Naresh was traveling alone.

Distortion No 2: The co-passengers passed religious comments on Junaid & brothers
Reality: The fight was only and only over sharing seats.

Distortion No 3: Junaid and brothers changed the bogie to solve the matter.
Reality: They changed the bogie so that they can call more goons.

Distortion No 4: The fight was over Beef
Reality: The entire altercation was over sharing seats only.

Distortion No 5: Junaid and his brothers did not harm anybody
Reality: Junaid beat up an old man and Naresh with his belt.

Distortion No 6: Naresh started the fight with communal "Beef" remarks
Reality: Junaid initiated the physical assault over sharing seats.

The Real Story as Admitted by Naresh, the Prime Accused in the Case:

Naresh who works as a security guard in a private firm in New Delhi was posted at the National Museum that day. On his way back home, 3-4 Muslim boys including Junaid were his co-passengers. At Okhla, a senior citizen boarded the train. Junaid and his friends were occupying too much space & were engrossed in playing Ludo & refused to share seats.

According to Naresh, they misbehaved with the old man who reprimanded them, advising them to behave properly. An infuriated Junaid manhandled the helpless senior citizen. At this juncture, Naresh and other co-passengers intervened. After being trashed by Naresh, the scared boys got down at Tughlakabad and moved to the next compartment.

The passengers assumed that the matter has been resolved. But Junaid was actually calling up goons from Ballabhgarh for revenge. Around 7-8 goons boarded the train at Ballabhgarh. They had sticks & chains. They started beating the old man.

Junaid identified Naresh and started hitting him with a leather belt. Naresh was hit on his head by the buckle and was bleeding profusely. He understood that he may get killed by these goons. Unable to control the mob, Naresh grabbed a knife and stabbed Junaid. As soon as the train reached Asavathi, he ran away. With the help of some pedestrians he reached his uncle's house from where he escaped to Dhule.

It is clear that Naresh would have lost his life, had he not retaliated. He resorted to the usage of knife only as the last resort to save himself.

If Junaid was really innocent, then why he called his friends, who came with sticks & chains?
How can it be called as lynching when Naresh was all alone?

We tend to draw conclusions based on few channels who want us to subscribe to their yellow-journalism narratives sugar coated with prime time shows and spooky reporting standards. We must go to the depths of every single case before blaming anybody irrespective of his or her identity. Finally, the truth about Junaid and his brothers have come out.

------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Ref:-
1] http://www.sudarshannews.com/category/national/categorynationalknow-about-real-truth-behind-janaid-case-at-ballabhgarh-hariyana--3994
2] http://www.dnaindia.com/india/report-stabbed-junaid-with-knife-in-a-fit-of-rage-naresh-rakh-2498053
3] http://www.thehindu.com/news/cities/Delhi/family-says-he-killed-teenager-in-self-defence/article19247122.ece

4] http://indianexpress.com/article/india/junaid-lynching-case-he-admitted-to-stabbing-once-news-appeared-say-brother-4743363/

Leave a comment

Make sure you enter all the required information, indicated by an asterisk (*). HTML code is not allowed.

Search